Privacy Policy | Contact Us  
logo
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

spacer
Hot Issues
Covid-19 resources
Jobkeeper Fraud warning
ATO extends initial JobKeeper payment deadline
Boosting cash flow - ATO
Our website, your resources
ATO releases JobKeeper alternative test
Temporary Working from Home Expenses Rule
Minimum Pensions Halved – 2020 & 2021
More coronavirus support for landlords, commercial tenants
COVID-19: Early Childhood Education and Care Relief Package
What Covid-19 relief packages mean to you.
Now I’m working from home, what can I claim?
Global statistics plus Covid-19 updates
ATO clarifies COVID-19 rent relief concerns
Banks to defer small-business loan repayments for 6 months
Historic $130bn wage subsidy to cover 6 million workers
Stage 2 – Covid-19 stimulus package.
Covid-19 Update - Small Business
PM launches $17.6 billion virus stimulus plan
SG amnesty bill passes Parliament
ATO flags most common SMSF return mistakes
Expected GDP by country 2010 to 2100
ATO expands small business review pilot
A resource hub for our clients.
Risks when dating documents in 2020
Australian Taxation Office (ATO) debts may affect your credit rating
Statistical picture of Australia - Update
Absentee Property Owner – Tax Whack - Victoria
Debate heats up around $10k cash ban bill
Articles archive
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
Quarter 3 of 2018
Articles
In case you missed it – The company tax Bill that did pass Parliament.
GST spotlight headed to smaller end of town
Superannuation Amnesty – Maybe! Maybe Not!
ATO drills in car-sharing focus this tax time
What is Bankruptcy?
Update of Australia's vital statistics
ATO speaks on risk factors, surveillance triggers for FY19
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash
ATO dispels top tax time myths to clients as clampdown rolls out
Tools for budgeting, cash flow, Super and more ….
Guidance for SMSFs on transfer balance reporting
ATO issues alert on super, tax scams
Salary sacrifice integrity
Understanding the evolution of blockchain and cryptocurrencies
Update to Australia's vital statistics
Tax Time Checklists- Individual, Company, Trust, Partnership and Super Funds
SMSFs - Our 'hardest' jobs
Tax Office reveals adventurous, dubious claims ahead of tax time
ATO reveals top tax time mistakes, set to contact 1 million taxpayers
Watch out for charges with incoming GST laws.
Super savings gap for women stuck at 30%
‘Wipe the slate clean’: Clients, accountants urged to use new amnesty period
Statistics for all Australians
ATO’s corporate residency guidance cops backlash

The tax office’s new approach to determining whether entities are resident under the central management and control test has drawn flak from industry bodies, noting technical issues with the guidance and disagreeing with the interpretation of the law.



       


 


Earlier, Taxation Ruling TR2018/5 was released in its final form, setting the Commissioner of Taxation’s position and the principles governing when a foreign incorporated company will be considered a resident in Australia for tax purposes.


The ruling sets out how to apply the central management and control test of corporate residency, with draft Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2018/D3 also released to apply the principles set out in the ruling.


However, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, the Tax Institute, Corporate Tax Association, the Group of 100 and the Business Law Section of the Law Council of Australia have all raised concerns about the draft PCG, with the five bodies banding together to make a submission to the ATO.


Accordingly, the joint bodies disagree with the ATO’s expression of the corporate residency test, noting how it conflates with both the expression in the draft PCG and TR 2018/5.


“The Joint Bodies consider that the test is a two-limb test and that it should be expressed that way in both TR 2018/5 and the Draft PCG.


“The fact that a company has its central management and control in Australia does not necessarily mean it is carrying on business in Australia, although in some factual scenarios it is possible that the very activities of central management and control can be the carrying on of business in Australia.


“The Joint Bodies believe that the interpretation of the corporate residency test adopted by the ATO in both TR 2018/5 and the Draft PCG are incongruous with the policy objectives of the corporate residency test and create uncertainty.”


Further, it notes several technical issues with the draft PCG, including the fact that some foreign incorporated companies may inadvertently meet the residency test, potentially leading to double-taxation if they pay an unfranked dividend.


The joint bodies also note concern over the approach to which the different forms of communication articulated in the draft PCG might ultimate increase red tape and limit business efficiency.


“Distinguishing between video conference, circular resolutions, teleconference and physical presence will tend to create inefficiency and artificiality,” the submission said.


"It may promote situations where an Australian resident director is required to physically travel to the foreign board meeting to avoid central management and control being at least partly in Australia.


“Requiring a minority Australian resident director, or indeed, a number of Australian resident directors to travel overseas to attend board meetings to avoid having a substantial degree of central management and control in Australia is not consistent with a desire to limit ‘red tape’ and to promote business efficiency.”


The joint bodies believe further review of the corporate residency test by the Board of Taxation 12 months after carries “significant merit” and could potentially warrant legislative change.


 


 


Jotham Lian  
08 August 2018
accountantsdaily.com.au




3rd-September-2018
spacer
sitemap | site by Acctweb