Privacy Policy | Contact Us  
logo
spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.

spacer
Hot Issues
Sub-trusts ‘redundant’ under final Div 7A ruling
Tax Office homing in property deductions, SMSFs warned
ATO adds indebted sole traders to credit referrals
State and Federal Covid support --- Aug 2022
ATO casts net wide when it comes to taxable business income
Largest natural gas produces by country from 1970-2021
NALI ‘a special problem for SMSFs’
Tax time tips
Census 2021 Data
Single Touch Payroll: Phase 2 deferral reminder
Largest inflation rates by country in Oceania
Write a business plan
Be wary of trust disclaimers, ATO warns
Tax time guide offers path through 100A
Car allowance increase ‘welcome news’
Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
ATO zeroes in on work expenses, crypto investments
Forget the Tim Tams in your WFH claim, say ‘fun police’
Inflation will force a third of businesses to raise prices
Year-end tax planning
World GDP Ranking (1960~2025)
100A ruling ‘turns tax avoidance logic on its head’
Company directors must register - all you need to know
Be alert for phoenix activity, businesses told
Equifax signs data agreement with ATO
E-invoicing will reduce emissions, says PwC
Largest cities in the world 1500 to 2100
Last chance to claim the loss carry-back
Changes to recovery loan scheme for small and medium enterprises
About the cash flow forecasting template
Articles archive
Quarter 2 April - June 2022
Quarter 1 January - March 2022
Quarter 4 October - December 2021
Quarter 3 July - September 2021
Quarter 2 April - June 2021
Quarter 1 January - March 2021
Quarter 4 October - December 2020
Quarter 3 July - September 2020
Quarter 2 April - June 2020
Quarter 1 January - March 2020
Quarter 4 October - December 2019
Quarter 3 July - September 2019
Quarter 2 April - June 2019
Quarter 1 January - March 2019
Quarter 4 October - December 2018
Quarter 3 July - September 2018
Quarter 2 April - June 2018
Quarter 1 January - March 2018
Quarter 4 October - December 2017
Quarter 3 July - September 2017
Quarter 2 April - June 2017
Quarter 1 January - March 2017
Quarter 4 October - December 2016
Quarter 3 July - September 2016
Quarter 2 April - June 2016
Quarter 1 January - March 2016
Quarter 4 October - December 2015
Quarter 3 July - September 2015
Quarter 2 April - June 2015
Quarter 1 January - March 2015
Quarter 4 October - December 2014
NALI ‘a special problem for SMSFs’

Tax benefits attract miscreants, but non-arm’s length rules should allow minor transgressions to be fixed, says CA ANZ.



 


Non-arm’s length rules designed to punish egregious behaviour make no allowance for benign transgressions in SMSFs that could simply be fixed, said the superannuation leader at CA ANZ, Tony Negline.


Speaking on the latest Accountants Daily podcast, Mr Negline said SMSF tax concessions are “a big shining light on the hill” and some people could not resist running up and grabbing it.


“As an example, let’s say someone owns a business where the shares have been valued at $50 a share. And they think well, what I could do is sell those for $1 a share to my fund, and then revalue them at market once they are held by the fund,” Mr Negline said.


“Now there are all sorts of other anti-avoidance measures that would apply to such a transaction. But then there’s also NALI, and to some extent this is what it’s designed to trap.”


Mr Negline said in that circumstance, the penalty would involve the ATO applying the highest marginal individual tax rate – 45 per cent – on some of the SMSF transactions.


“They may apply it to taxable contributions that have been made, they may apply it to the income that’s earned from that investment and when those shares are sold by the fund, they may apply it to the net capital gain. Depending on the circumstances, they might do variations of that,” Mr Negline said.


But he said at the other end of the scale, relatively minor transgressions without malign intent could attract similar penalties.


“So an accountant who runs their own fund, their accounting practice let’s say does the accounting work, prepares the financial statements, does the self-managed super fund annual return, manages the audit and so on,” Mr Negline said.


“If there’s no charge for that, or minimal charge, you can find that the whole income of the fund can be taxed at 45 per cent. As opposed to just saying, Okay, that’s a $2,000 or $3,000 expense that’s been missed.


“It seems disproportionate to what would be reasonable. That’s the problem with the rules as they are now drafted.”


The ATO had issued a practical compliance guide that said it would not apply any compliance resources to such general fund expenses until July 2023.


Mr Negline said professional bodies had called on Canberra to amend the law and the previous Coalition government had indicated a willingness to act. The issue was now in the in-tray of the new Labor government.


Successful amendments would still catch the share trade in the first example, he said, but adopt a more lenient approach to relatively benign situations such as the in-house accounting example.


Mr Negline said there could be a number of ways of dealing with a minor transgression.


“Maybe, if the Commissioner identifies that, or it’s found during an audit the ATO could have a range of solutions – say, well that’s a minor expense, we’re going to ignore that and we’ll move on,” Mr Negline said.


“Or they could say, well, look, we found this. This is your first offence, you’ve been a bit silly, run away and fix it up, we’ll give you a timeframe and we’d like you to fix it up in this way, or whatever it might be. We think that’s a potential solution.”


Ultimately, the government would decide but the test would be how it worked in practice.


“The ability to correct unintended mistakes is probably the way that it needs to go. Otherwise, there’s no other solution because if you can’t fix things up, then the only way is to apply tax penalties,” Mr Negline said.


“The situation we talked about – $2,000 or $3,000 of accounting fees, let’s say, that weren’t charged – to then apply 45 per cent to the whole income of the fund if you can’t fix that up, then that just seems bizarre.”


The fix might be making good the shortfall in the expense, or deeming the unpaid amount to be a contribution.


“But as long as there’s some sort of corrective mechanism that’s reasonable and not administratively burdensome and costs a fortune to implement at both the ATO level and the fund level, then you’d have to be happy about that,” Mr Negline said.


 


 


 


Philip King
19 July 2022
accountantsdaily.com.au




9th-August-2022
spacer
sitemap | site by Acctweb